Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support

[Shmulik Ladkani]

On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:58:01 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To write the ubibis and to ubibis? Hmm... not sure.
> 
> To write the fastmap and to fastmap or decide to not fastmap because all
> PEBs within the first 64 have too high erasecounter? Sounds better IMO.

FWIW, fastmap sounds reasonable to me.

(aside from the fact that "fast" is the outcome of using the map,
whereas the map's definition is essentially a peb/leb map).

Anyways,

CONFIG_MTD_UBI_FASTMAP, ubi_find_fastmap(), ubi_scan_fastmap(),
ubi_read_fastmap(), ubi_update_fastmap() ...

all seem pretty explanatory IMO.

Using plain "map" (ubi_find_map, ubi_update_map) might also be an
option, however it might be less obvious.

Regards,
Shmulik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/