Re: Build broken on s390 and ia64 [was: Linux 2.6.32.58]

[Heiko Carstens]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 07:09 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > I'm announcing the release of the 2.6.32.58 kernel.
> ...
> > Heiko Carstens (1): compat: fix compile breakage on s390
> 
> It's not that minimal it suggests. It removed asm/compat.h inclusion
> from arch/s390/kernel/setup.c. This causes build failures on
> !CONFIG_COMPAT:
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_addressing_mode':
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:382: error: 'PSW32_ASC_SECONDARY' undeclared
> (first use in this function)
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:382: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:382: error: for each function it appears in.)
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:389: error: 'PSW32_ASC_PRIMARY' undeclared
> (first use in this function)

Ah, right. For kernels < 3.0 it is indeed necessary to include
asm/compat.h in arch/s390/kernel/setup.c.

The need for that got eliminated with
043d07084b5347a26eab0a07aa13a4a929ad9e71 "[S390] Remove data execution
protection".

> Perhaps asm/compat.h should be included from linux/compat.h
> unconditionally...

If you do that you need to add #ifdef wrappers around the is_compat_task()
definitions in each arch that supports CONFIG_COMPAT. If that's all that's
needed that would be great!

> > Linus Torvalds (2): Fix autofs compile without CONFIG_COMPAT
> 
> But who defines is_compat_task *with* CONFIG_COMPAT on ia64?
> 
> fs/autofs4/inode.c: In function 'autofs4_fill_super':
> fs/autofs4/inode.c:345: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'is_compat_task'

The ia64 compat code got entirely removed, since it was broken:

32974ad4907cdde6c9de612cd1b2ee0568fb9409 "[IA64] Remove COMPAT_IA32 support"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/