Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCHv23 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator

[Barry Song]

Michal,

2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2012/2/23 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> This is (yet another) quick update of CMA patches. I've rebased them
>>> onto next-20120222 tree from
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git and
>>> fixed the bug pointed by Aaro Koskinen.
>>
>>
>> For the whole series:
>>
>> Tested-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA:
>
>
> Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or
> similar)?

i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed
in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA
to users who want to use cma. i also think we should have a seperate
document to explain cma in details in documents/, and my helper
program can be placed there.

how do you think?
>
> --
> Best regards, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â _ Â Â _
> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of   Âo' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science, ÂMichaÅ âmina86â Nazarewicz  Â(o o)
> ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--

thanks
barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/