Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update

From: Ian Kent
Date: Wed Feb 22 2012 - 20:54:54 EST


On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:48 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 08:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, DOH ...
> > >
> > > The process mounting the autofs mount is passing the pipe it will use
> > > for communication via a mount option so we can do this right in
> > > fill_super.
> >
> > No, we really cannot.
>
> Sorry, I think your wrong this time.

On second thought, I suppose other user space users don't "have" to use
mount(2) ....

>
> >
> > The autofs "mount" is done by fork + execve("mount").
>
> It's done like this when mounting things inside an already mounted
> indirect autofs mount or when mounting things on autofs direct mount
> triggers but, in version 5, mount(2) has always used to mount autofs
> file systems.
>
> Ian


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/