Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i387: support lazy restore of FPU state

[H. Peter Anvin]

Running build tests now; will check results in the morning.

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:14 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 02/20/2012 06:10 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>>> Although I do wonder if we should just make kernel_fpu_begin() be a
>>> real function instead of inlining it. I'm not sure it makes sense to
>>> inline that thing, and it might be better to export that one
>instead.
>>> Comments?
>>
>> I would agree with that.
>
>So I have a patch that does that, but it's noticeably bigger.
>
>It uninlines a fair amount of i387.h, and moves it into i387.c. I do
>think it's probably the right thing to do, though.
>
>I did a "make allmodconfig" with this on x86-64, but it's quite
>possible that x86-32 does additional cases. Does this patch work for
>people?
>
>(This is *on*top*of* the quick "let's just get it to work" patch that
>just exports the new percpu variable. I already committed that and
>pushed it out, since I wanted a quick fix so that people wouldn't be
>held up by this)
>
>IOW, if you can try this on top of current -git, that would be lovely.
>
>                         Linus

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/