Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] rcu: direct algorithmic SRCU implementation

[Lai Jiangshan]

On 02/21/2012 01:44 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> 
>> My conclusion, we can just remove the check-and-return path to reduce
>> the complexity since we will introduce call_srcu().
> 
> If I actually submit the above upstream, that would be quite reasonable.
> My thought is that patch remains RFC and the upstream version has
> call_srcu().

Does the work of call_srcu() is started or drafted?

> 
>> This new srcu is very great, especially the SRCU_USAGE_COUNT for every
>> lock/unlock witch forces any increment/decrement pair changes the counter
>> for me.
> 
> Glad you like it!  ;-)
> 
> And thank you for your review and feedback!

Could you add my Reviewed-by when this patch is last submitted?


Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Lai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/