Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] sched: entity load-tracking re-work

[Nikunj A Dadhania]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:48:06 -0800, Paul Turner <pjt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This is almost certainly a result of me twiddling with the weight in
> calc_cfs_shares (using average instead of instantaneous weight) in
> this version -- see patch 11/14.  While this had some nice stability
> properties it was not hot for fairness so I've since reverted it
> (snippet attached below).
>
For my understanding, what do you mean by stability here?

> 
> 24-core:
> Starting task group fair16...done
> Starting task group fair32...done
> Starting task group fair48...done
> Waiting for the task to run for 120 secs
> Interpreting the results. Please wait....
> Time consumed by fair16 cgroup:  12628615 Tasks: 96
> Time consumed by fair32 cgroup:  12562859 Tasks: 192
> Time consumed by fair48 cgroup:  12600364 Tasks: 288
> 
"Tasks:" should be 16,32,48? 

Regards,
Nikunj

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/