Re: [PATCH 04/18] ARM: at91: make ST (System Timer) soc independent

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 07:33 Mon 20 Feb     , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:02:34AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 12:52 Mon 20 Feb     , Ryan Mallon wrote:
> > > That isn't an excuse to leave incorrect code there. It is a simple fix.
> > no (void) in c means you don't care of the return so basically it's right
> 
> Let's be clear: it's legal, but redundant and unnecessary.
So as I said it's no the focus of this patch

I don't want to do it at the same time

Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/