Re: [PATCH] ptrace: add ability to get clear_tid_address

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:30:47PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > 
> > Yes, could be, but it means you have to install pthread debug libs, right?
> > (have no idea actually since I personally use debug printing instead of
> >  breakpoints).
> 
> Not really more than what we need today.  Just some exported function name
> in the elf symbol tables.  Assuming a the program is using clear_child_tid
> address for pthread_join as glibc is may not be a good idea.  It's doing
> things at the wrong layer.  Also, hardware watchpoints are a scarse
> resource.

It's pretty precious resource still incredibly useful. ok, i see
what you mean, thanks.

> 
> >> It's the kernel that writes to this address, so I've no
> >> idea if the watchpoint trap ends up visible on userspace. Which thread
> >> would it be reported to, given that this is cleared when the child
> >> is gone, I have no idea either.
> > 
> > Yeah, need some help from someone who wrote hw-breakpoints support in
> > kernel (i don't remember the details).
> 
> I just tried it.  This is &pthread->tid in glibc/libpthread, so with debug
> info it's easy to figure out where to set the watchpoint manually with gdb
> without asking the kernel.  Doesn't work.  ptrace doesn't show any trap
> for the kernel writes.
>

Thanks for info. 

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/