Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM / Sleep: Initialize wakeup source locks inwakeup_source_add()

From: John Stultz
Date: Tue Feb 07 2012 - 17:30:40 EST


On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 02:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>
> Initialize wakeup source locks in wakeup_source_add() instead of
> wakeup_source_create(), because otherwise the locks of the wakeup
> sources that haven't been allocated with wakeup_source_create()
> aren't initialized and handled properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>

Ah, I've shot myself in the foot before, forgetting to init the wakeup
source, so this should be good. Although, would a WARN_ON be better then
just initializing the lock in add? That way bad behavior is more likely
to be corrected, rather then just ignored.

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/