[PATCH 01/11] netvm: Prevent a stream-specific deadlock

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Mon Feb 06 2012 - 18:01:30 EST


It could happen that all !SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets have buffered so
much data that we're over the global rmem limit. This will prevent
SOCK_MEMALLOC buffers from receiving data, which will prevent userspace
from running, which is needed to reduce the buffered data.

Fix this by exempting the SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets from the rmem limit.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
---
include/net/sock.h | 7 ++++---
net/caif/caif_socket.c | 2 +-
net/core/sock.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 12 ++++++------
net/sctp/ulpevent.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index bb147fd..bdae68a 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1249,12 +1249,13 @@ static inline int sk_wmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
__sk_mem_schedule(sk, size, SK_MEM_SEND);
}

-static inline int sk_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
+static inline int sk_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!sk_has_account(sk))
return 1;
- return size <= sk->sk_forward_alloc ||
- __sk_mem_schedule(sk, size, SK_MEM_RECV);
+ return skb->truesize <= sk->sk_forward_alloc ||
+ __sk_mem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize, SK_MEM_RECV) ||
+ skb_pfmemalloc(skb);
}

static inline void sk_mem_reclaim(struct sock *sk)
diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
index a986280..78ef332 100644
--- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
+++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int caif_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
err = sk_filter(sk, skb);
if (err)
return err;
- if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize) && rx_flow_is_on(cf_sk)) {
+ if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb) && rx_flow_is_on(cf_sk)) {
set_rx_flow_off(cf_sk);
if (net_ratelimit())
pr_debug("sending flow OFF due to rmem_schedule\n");
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 0aebbde..cf81592 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ int sock_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (err)
return err;

- if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize)) {
+ if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb)) {
atomic_inc(&sk->sk_drops);
return -ENOBUFS;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 976034f..b46bc36 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -4405,19 +4405,19 @@ static void tcp_ofo_queue(struct sock *sk)
static int tcp_prune_ofo_queue(struct sock *sk);
static int tcp_prune_queue(struct sock *sk);

-static inline int tcp_try_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, unsigned int size)
+static inline int tcp_try_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk->sk_rcvbuf ||
- !sk_rmem_schedule(sk, size)) {
+ !sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb)) {

if (tcp_prune_queue(sk) < 0)
return -1;

- if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, size)) {
+ if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb)) {
if (!tcp_prune_ofo_queue(sk))
return -1;

- if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, size))
+ if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb))
return -1;
}
}
@@ -4470,7 +4470,7 @@ static void tcp_data_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (eaten <= 0) {
queue_and_out:
if (eaten < 0 &&
- tcp_try_rmem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize))
+ tcp_try_rmem_schedule(sk, skb))
goto drop;

skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
@@ -4541,7 +4541,7 @@ drop:

TCP_ECN_check_ce(tp, skb);

- if (tcp_try_rmem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize))
+ if (tcp_try_rmem_schedule(sk, skb))
goto drop;

/* Disable header prediction. */
diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpevent.c b/net/sctp/ulpevent.c
index 8a84017..6c6ed2d 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ulpevent.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ulpevent.c
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ struct sctp_ulpevent *sctp_ulpevent_make_rcvmsg(struct sctp_association *asoc,
if (rx_count >= asoc->base.sk->sk_rcvbuf) {

if ((asoc->base.sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK) ||
- (!sk_rmem_schedule(asoc->base.sk, chunk->skb->truesize)))
+ (!sk_rmem_schedule(asoc->base.sk, chunk->skb)))
goto fail;
}

--
1.7.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/