RE: [PATCH 01/11] dmaengine: add context parametertoprep_slave_sgand prep_dma_cyclic

From: Vinod Koul
Date: Mon Feb 06 2012 - 13:05:16 EST

On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 09:02 -0800, Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
> What if we introduce another dma_transaction_type like DMA_SLAVE_EXT
> (extended?).
> In this case all devices that adhere to the generic SLAVE interface
> still be
> registered as DMA_SLAVE and those that do not follow generic route use
that way it would be channel specific not transaction specific as you
had asked for...?

Again, how does this solve problem of passing parameters while
preventing abuse...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at