Re: [PATCH][RFC] XFS: Fix mem leak and possible NULL deref inxfs_setattr_nonsize()
From: Dave Chinner
Date: Mon Feb 06 2012 - 01:23:20 EST
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:23:44PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> In xfs_setattr_nonsize(), xfs_trans_alloc() gets its memory from
> _xfs_trans_alloc() which gets it from kmem_zone_zalloc() which may
> fail and return NULL. So this:
> tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_SETATTR_NOT_SIZE);
> may result in a NULL 'tp'.
> If it does, then the call:
> error = xfs_trans_reserve(tp, 0, XFS_ICHANGE_LOG_RES(mp), 0, 0, 0);
> with a NULL 'tp' will explode, since xfs_trans_reserve() dereferences
> its first argument unconditionally.
xfs_trans_alloc() can't fail. It will sleep forever until the memory
There's 35 other places in XFS where this xfs_trans_alloc/
xfs_trans_reserve pattern occurs - none of them check whether tp is
> And if the memory allocation for 'tp' goes well (and thus
> xfs_trans_reserve() does not explode) then we may leak the memory
> allocated to 'tp' if xfs_trans_reserve() returns error.
yes, that's a problem, though will only happen if a filesystem
shutdown occurs between the start of the function and that check.
> I believe this patch should fix both issues, but I'm not intimate with
> the XFS code at all, so there can easily be something I overlooked or
> something that should be done differently than what I did.
Only need to fix the leak of tp.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/