Re: [PATCH resent v2 1/2] ioport : add DEFINE_RES_DMA_SIZE_NAMED macro

[Huang Shijie]

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 07:53:31PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> Does any one have any comments about this patch?
>
> Yes. ÂHaving a flat numberspace for DMAs invites the same problems that
> we have with the flat IRQ numberspace when it comes to having multiple
> DMA controllers.
>
> With DMA engine drivers, channels are allocated using a match function
> and unspecified match data. ÂWhile a linear numberspace can be used,
> that sets itself up for clashing between different DMA controllers
> especially if the numberspace overlaps.
>
> What's missing from this patch set is an illustration of how this will
> be used.
>
> Another issue here is that having the peripheral drivers know about the
> exact match function and what data the DMA engines require ties the
> periperal drivers to their respective DMA engine. ÂOne of the points of
> DMA engine is to separate that knowledge, so that the same peripheral IP
> can be re-used with different DMA engines.
>
> To encode knowledge of the DMA engine into the peripheral driver basically
> destroys the purpose of having a DMA engine API.
>
> So, I believe that _if_ we are going down the path of using the DMA engine
> API for our SoCs, we really don't want to invent a linear DMA numberspace
> by putting DMA numbers into resources.

ok. thanks.


Huang Shijie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/