Re: [PATCH] selftests: Make run_tests executable

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Thu Feb 02 2012 - 07:39:52 EST


On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:54:03AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:24:53 +0100
> Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:51:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:04:29 +0100
> > > Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Make the main script that launches the tests to
> > > > become executable. Otherwise people need to launch
> > > > it as an argument to a new bash instance.
> > > >
> > >
> > > That's a feature ;)
> > >
> > > The x bit can easily get lost on kernel scripts. For example, if
> > > someone upgrades their kernel with patch(1) and the patch adds or
> > > renames the script, the x bit gets lost.
> > >
> > > If we were to set the x bit for the subset of people who get their
> > > scripts direct from a git repository then those people might write and
> > > distribute tools which fail when used by people who have lost their x
> > > bit. I've seen this happen at least once before.
> > >
> >
> > I see. Another way could be to chmod the run_test script from the Makefile.
> > Would that sound clumsy?
>
> I suggest we remove the script and make it a makefile target instead.
> "make tests" or whatever. As a microbonus that would remove the need
> to duplicate the TARGETS definition in the two scripts.

Sounds good. But we still need the TARGET in the makefile to list the
directories. Although I can do a simple ls.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/