Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump, ioapic: Fix kdump race with migrating irq

From: Vivek Goyal
Date: Tue Jan 31 2012 - 16:37:19 EST


On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:25:14PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> A customer of ours noticed when their machine crashed, kdump did not
> work but hung instead. Using their firmware dumping solution they
> grabbed a vmcore and decoded the stacks on the cpus. What they
> noticed seemed to be a rare deadlock with the ioapic_lock.
>
> CPU4:
> machine_crash_shutdown
> -> machine_ops.crash_shutdown
> -> native_machine_crash_shutdown
> -> kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus ------> Send NMI to other CPUs
> -> disable_IO_APIC
> -> clear_IO_APIC
> -> clear_IO_APIC_pin
> -> ioapic_read_entry
> -> spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags)
> ---Infinite loop here---
>
> CPU0:
> do_IRQ
> -> handle_irq
> -> handle_edge_irq
> -> ack_apic_edge
> -> move_native_irq
> -> mask_IO_APIC_irq
> -> mask_IO_APIC_irq_desc
> -> spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags)
> ---Receive NMI here after getting spinlock---
> -> nmi
> -> do_nmi
> -> crash_nmi_callback
> ---Infinite loop here---
>
> The problem is that although kdump tries to shutdown minimal hardware,
> it still needs to disable the IO APIC. This requires spinlocks which
> may be held by another cpu. This other cpu is being held infinitely in
> an NMI context by kdump in order to serialize the crashing path. Instant
> deadlock.
>
> I attempted to resolve this by busting the spinlock in the kdump case only.
> My justification was that kdump has already stopped the other cpus and it
> is only clearing the io apic which shouldn't cause harm when overwriting
> what the other cpu was doing.
>
> I tested this by loading a dummy module that grabs the ioapic_lock and then
> on another cpu, run 'echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger'. The deadlock was detected
> and fixed with the patch below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>

Sounds reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/