Re: [PATCH 02/13] PCI: Add busn_res operation functions

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Mon Jan 30 2012 - 10:29:17 EST


On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> will use them insert/update busn res in pci_bus
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci.h |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index a114173..71261da 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1622,6 +1622,50 @@ err_out:
>        return NULL;
>  }
>
> +void pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int bus_max)
> +{
> +       struct resource *res = &b->busn_res;
> +       struct resource *parent_res = &iobusn_resource;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       res->start = (pci_domain_nr(b) << 8) | bus;
> +       res->end = (pci_domain_nr(b) << 8) | bus_max;
> +       res->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> +
> +       if (!pci_is_root_bus(b))
> +               parent_res = &b->parent->busn_res;
> +
> +       ret = insert_resource(parent_res, res);
> +
> +       dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &b->dev,
> +        "busn_res: %06llx-%06llx %s inserted under %06llx-%06llx\n",
> +                       (unsigned long long)res->start,
> +                       (unsigned long long)res->end,
> +                        ret ? "can not be" : "is",
> +                       (unsigned long long)parent_res->start,
> +                       (unsigned long long)parent_res->end);

Please update the %pR implementation so you can use it instead of
having to fiddle around with start/end separately and casts.

> +}
> +
> +void pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(struct pci_bus *b, int bus_max)
> +{
> +       struct resource *res = &b->busn_res;
> +       unsigned long long old_end = res->end;
> +
> +       res->end &= ~0xff;
> +       res->end |= bus_max;

This updates a resource in place, without removing it from the
resource tree and re-inserting it. Doesn't this make it possible to
corrupt the resource tree? For example, let's say you have this tree:

00-3f : host bridge A
00-1f : P2P bridge B
40-7f : host bridge C

Now you use pci_bus_update_busn_res_end() to update the resource for
P2P bridge B, setting its end to 5f. I think the resource tree is
now corrupted.

> +       dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &b->dev,
> +                "busn_res: %06llx-%06llx end updated to %06llx-%06llx\n",
> +                       (unsigned long long)res->start,
> +                       old_end,
> +                       (unsigned long long)res->start,
> +                       (unsigned long long)res->end);
> +}
> +
> +void pci_bus_release_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b)
> +{
> +       release_resource(&b->busn_res);
> +}
> +
>  struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 94ad468..3da935c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -665,6 +665,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
>  struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                                    struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
>                                    struct list_head *resources);
> +void pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int busmax);
> +void pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(struct pci_bus *b, int busmax);
> +void pci_bus_release_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b);
>  struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                                             struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
>                                             struct list_head *resources);
> --
> 1.7.7
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/