Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: care sd_dma_address/len indmaengine_prep_slave_single()

[Vinod Koul]

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 01:25 -0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> dmaengine_prep_slave_single() is helper macro of dmaengine.
> But it doesn't have sg_dma_address/len() settings which are required.
> And it used void *buf in parameter, but it should be dma_addr_t.
> This patch fixes up it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/dmaengine.h |    9 +++++++--
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index 75f53f8..f47c578 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -521,11 +521,16 @@ static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dmaengine_prep_slave_single(
> -	struct dma_chan *chan, void *buf, size_t len,
> +	struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t buf, size_t len,
>  	enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long flags)
dma_transfer_direction... this is not based on 3.3-rc1 or
slave-dma/next?

>  {
>  	struct scatterlist sg;
> -	sg_init_one(&sg, buf, len);
> +
> +	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
> +	sg_set_page(&sg, pfn_to_page(PFN_DOWN(buf)),
> +		    len, offset_in_page(buf));
> +	sg_dma_address(&sg) = buf;
> +	sg_dma_len(&sg) = len;
>  
>  	return chan->device->device_prep_slave_sg(chan, &sg, 1, dir, flags);
>  }


-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/