Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2

[Shawn Guo]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:43:36AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
...
> The cost of the pmx@dta node is about 12 bytes for the header (it
> depends on the length of the name), and each of the properties above
> is 16 bytes. So in total this node is 76 bytes. If we have 250 pins
> being muxed as Tegra3 then this is about 20KB (including a bit of
> slack for longer names). My point about being able to 'optimise out'
> some of these remains, though, but probably not for the kernel.
> 
> Stephen's 'mux' property uses 12 bytes plus 8 bytes per pin/group (I
> am removing the prefixes):
> 
>                        mux =
>                                <PG_DTA   MUX_SDIO1>
>                                <PG_DTD   MUX_SDIO1>;
> 
> so 28 bytes. What I proposed would use (12 + 2 * 16) per pin/group, or
> 44 bytes (60% bigger):
> 
It's not only about size but also run-time tree travelling efficiency.
Your proposal requires every single pin show as a node in device tree.
Looking at these for_each_node_by_*() APIs in include/linux/of.h, you
might agree we should avoid bloating device tree with so many nodes.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/