Re: [v7 1/8] smp: introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask function

From: Gilad Ben-Yossef
Date: Sun Jan 29 2012 - 07:24:16 EST


On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> on_each_cpu_mask calls a function on processors specified by
> cpumask, which may or may not include the local processor.
>
> You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
> from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
...
> ---
>  include/linux/smp.h |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/smp.c        |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>


Milton made the very sensible comment that while adding on_each_cpu() in the
arch generic code and removing the two arch specific instances from tile and arm
in separate patches is good for review, it will break bisect.

He suggested I squash them into a single commit when it goes in.

Since you picked the patch set into linux-mm, will now be a good time for that?

Thanks,
Gilad

--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com

"Unfortunately, cache misses are an equal opportunity pain provider."
-- Mike Galbraith, LKML
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/