Re: [3.2+] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100

[Yves-Alexis Perez]

On jeu., 2012-01-26 at 08:15 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Very odd, it wouldn't seem that this patch would cause such a problem,
> as it is "obviously" correct.
> 
> Kuninori, any thoughts about this?  Should I revert this from the
> tree? 

Something puzzles me. Just after posting I noticed that 3.2.2 was
released, so i tried it (vanilla), and I didn't get the BUG().

Will git bisect work in a forward way (3.2.1 is bad, 3.2.2 is good).

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part