Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2

[Shawn Guo]

Hi Tony,

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:00:52PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
...
> So to summarize: I suggest we'll just stick to basics to get the system
> booting and devices working using device tree. In most cases the device
> drivers should be able to configure the suspend and off states in a generic
> way using pinctrl API. Everything else, like debugging, we can probably
> do with userspace tools.
> 
> This would mean just using a minimal subset of your binding, probably
> very close to what you originally suggested.
> 
IMHO, as a generic device tree binding, it should be able to cope with
different use cases.  It's really free for you to use the minimal
subset of the binding as your need, but we should not make the binding
design just be that minimal subset to force that everyone else can
only use the minimal subset.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/