Re: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming)

[Wolfram Sang]

> Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check
> tomorrow with colleagues.

Shouldn't matter that much, or? Once the core support is back and works for
your board, others could test with their boards.

> I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers
> currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific
> tree I should update from?

You can keep the work92105_defconfig in your tree, but we'd need to introduce a
lpc32xx_defconfig. That should start with a minimal (but working) config and
can be extended once the drivers are in place.

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature