[PATCH] x86: uninitialized spinlocks in tlb_uv.c

[Cliff Wickman]

From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>

Initialize two spinlocks in tlb_uv.c.

The lack of explicit initialization seems to be functionally harmless (the
locks are initialized to 0's), but it is diagnosed when these are turned on:
        CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
        CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
        CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
        CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y

Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Index: 120113.linux-3.2.1/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
===================================================================
--- 120113.linux-3.2.1.orig/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ 120113.linux-3.2.1/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -1851,6 +1851,8 @@ static void __init init_per_cpu_tunables
 		bcp->cong_reps			= congested_reps;
 		bcp->cong_period		= congested_period;
 		bcp->clocks_per_100_usec =	usec_2_cycles(100);
+		spin_lock_init(&bcp->queue_lock);
+		spin_lock_init(&bcp->uvhub_lock);
 	}
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/