Re: Kernel crash in icq_free_icq_rcu

From: Shaohua Li
Date: Wed Jan 18 2012 - 01:02:43 EST


On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 09:30 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:11 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:05:26AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > Vivek is seeing the problem while switching elevators. Are you too?
> > > > Or is it during normal operation?
> > > same here. I had some problems when I debug my ioscheduler, but
> > > eventually found even switching cfq and noop can trigger oops.
> >
> > Hmmm... maybe quiescing isn't working as expected and kmem cache is
> > being destroyed with live icq's. I'll try to reproduce it.
> this debug patch seems to fix for me.
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index e6c05a9..c6a8ef5 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -872,11 +872,11 @@ retry:
> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>
> /* create icq if missing */
> - if (unlikely(et->icq_cache && !icq))
> + if (unlikely(et->icq_cache && !icq && (rw_flags & REQ_ELVPRIV)))
> icq = ioc_create_icq(q, gfp_mask);
>
> /* rqs are guaranteed to have icq on elv_set_request() if requested */
> - if (likely(!et->icq_cache || icq))
> + if (likely(!et->icq_cache || icq || !(rw_flags & REQ_ELVPRIV)))
> rq = blk_alloc_request(q, icq, rw_flags, gfp_mask);
>
> if (unlikely(!rq)) {
>
Here is the formal patch. I hope it fixes all the problems related to
icq_cache, but please open an eye :)


Subject: block: fix NULL icq_cache reference

CPU0: CPU1:
switch from cfq to noop
elv_quiesce_start
C: get_request
A: ioc_create_icq
alloc icq with cfq
B: do elevator switch
ioc_clear_queue
elv_quiesce_end
insert icq to ioc
switch from noop to cfq
elv_quiesce_start
do elevator switch
ioc_clear_queue
elv_quiesce_end
CPU0 leaves some icq to ioc list after elevator is switching from cfq to noop.
in the second ioc_clear_queue, the ioc has icq in its list, but current
elevator is noop. so ioc_exit_icq will get a NULL et->icq_cache.

In above cases, if A runs after B, ioc_create_icq will have a NULL
et->icq_cache, this will trigger another crash.

Note, get_request caches et without lock hold. Between C and A, a elevator
switch can start. But we will have elvpriv++, elv_quiesce_start will drain
all requests first. So this will not trigger crash.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux/block/blk-core.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/block/blk-core.c 2012-01-18 12:44:13.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/block/blk-core.c 2012-01-18 12:45:28.000000000 +0800
@@ -872,11 +872,11 @@ retry:
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);

/* create icq if missing */
- if (unlikely(et->icq_cache && !icq))
+ if (unlikely(et->icq_cache && !icq && (rw_flags & REQ_ELVPRIV)))
icq = ioc_create_icq(q, gfp_mask);

/* rqs are guaranteed to have icq on elv_set_request() if requested */
- if (likely(!et->icq_cache || icq))
+ if (likely(!et->icq_cache || icq || !(rw_flags & REQ_ELVPRIV)))
rq = blk_alloc_request(q, icq, rw_flags, gfp_mask);

if (unlikely(!rq)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/