Re: [PATCH 1/2] hid-multitouch: add support for trackpads

From: Henrik Rydberg
Date: Mon Jan 16 2012 - 09:53:21 EST


Hi Benjamin,

> * some multitouch trackpads present the touch usage. This needs to be
> filtered as it will conflict with mt-implementation.
> * trackpads send BTN_TOOL_* to notify how many fingers are present
> (this is used by xorg to use synaptics instead of generic evdev)
> * trackpads like Perixx 701 are not different from a hid point of view
> from a touchscreen, and we need to manually set them as touchpad.

Missing subject line?

> @@ -265,17 +266,31 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> {
> struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
> struct mt_class *cls = &td->mtclass;
> + int code;
>
> /* Only map fields from TouchScreen or TouchPad collections.
> * We need to ignore fields that belong to other collections
> * such as Mouse that might have the same GenericDesktop usages. */
> if (field->application == HID_DG_TOUCHSCREEN)
> set_bit(INPUT_PROP_DIRECT, hi->input->propbit);
> - else if (field->application == HID_DG_TOUCHPAD)
> - set_bit(INPUT_PROP_POINTER, hi->input->propbit);
> - else
> + else if (field->application != HID_DG_TOUCHPAD)
> return 0;
>
> + /* In case of an indirect device (touchpad), we need to add
> + * specific BTN_TOOL_* to be handled by the synaptics xorg
> + * driver.
> + * We also consider that touchscreens providing buttons are touchpads.
> + */
> + if (field->application == HID_DG_TOUCHPAD ||
> + (usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) == HID_UP_BUTTON ||
> + cls->is_indirect) {
> + set_bit(INPUT_PROP_POINTER, hi->input->propbit);
> + set_bit(BTN_TOOL_FINGER, hi->input->keybit);
> + set_bit(BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP, hi->input->keybit);
> + set_bit(BTN_TOOL_TRIPLETAP, hi->input->keybit);
> + set_bit(BTN_TOOL_QUADTAP, hi->input->keybit);
> + }
> +
> /* eGalax devices provide a Digitizer.Stylus input which overrides
> * the correct Digitizers.Finger X/Y ranges.
> * Let's just ignore this input. */
> @@ -389,9 +404,20 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> td->last_field_index = field->index;
> return -1;
> }
> + case HID_DG_TOUCH:
> + /* Legacy devices use TIPSWITCH and not TOUCH.
> + * Let's just ignore this field. */
> + return -1;
> /* let hid-input decide for the others */
> return 0;
>
> + case HID_UP_BUTTON:
> + code = ((usage->hid - 1) & HID_USAGE);
> + code += BTN_MOUSE;

Any reason not to write ((usage->hid - 1) & HID_USAGE) | BTN_MOUSE?

> + hid_map_usage(hi, usage, bit, max, EV_KEY, code);
> + input_set_capability(hi->input, EV_KEY, code);
> + return 1;
> +
> case 0xff000000:
> /* we do not want to map these: no input-oriented meaning */
> return -1;
> @@ -453,6 +479,7 @@ static void mt_complete_slot(struct mt_device *td)
> static void mt_emit_event(struct mt_device *td, struct input_dev *input)
> {
> int i;
> + int finger_count = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < td->maxcontacts; ++i) {
> struct mt_slot *s = &(td->slots[i]);
> @@ -477,12 +504,14 @@ static void mt_emit_event(struct mt_device *td, struct input_dev *input)
> input_event(input, EV_ABS, ABS_MT_PRESSURE, s->p);
> input_event(input, EV_ABS, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, major);
> input_event(input, EV_ABS, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MINOR, minor);
> + finger_count++;
> }
> s->seen_in_this_frame = false;
>
> }
>
> input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(input, true);
> + input_mt_report_finger_count(input, finger_count);
> input_sync(input);
> td->num_received = 0;
> }
> @@ -538,6 +567,9 @@ static int mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
> if (value)
> td->num_expected = value;
> break;
> + case HID_DG_TOUCH:
> + /* do nothing */
> + break;
>
> default:
> /* fallback to the generic hidinput handling */
> --
> 1.7.4.4

Looks good otherwise.

Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/