Re: aacraid question: is maximum_num_containers supposed to beminimum?

[Dan Carpenter]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:38:55AM -0500, Xi Wang wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > MAXIMUM_NUM_CONTAINERS is consistently used as a minimum not a maximum
> > so I was wondering what was up with that?  This is ancient code that
> > predates git.
> 
> Check out some early discussion. ;-)
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/3/85

Heh.  That's weird that we were both looking at the same code so
many years down the line.

Still Haogang is assuming that MAXIMUM_NUM_CONTAINERS is supposed to
be a minimum instead of it just being used that way by mistake.
Mark is more familiar with code and thought it was supposed to be a
maximum.

regards,
dan carpenter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature