Re: Bug in BLKBSZSET/GET ioctl ?

[Wu Fengguang]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:45AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> Hi all:
> 
> This is first reported to *libguestfs*: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624335
> 
> Then, I looked into upstream util-linux and it seems nothing wrong. I'm not convinced that it's a kernel bug.
> 
> produce:
> 
> ---
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
> 4096
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --setbsz 2048 /dev/sda6
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
> 4096
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --setbsz 512 /dev/sda6
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
> 4096

I think each blockdev invocation is working on a *new* bdev object.
You'll get consistent results if somehow keep it referenced, for
example, run a background copy task:

# cp /dev/sda6 /dev/null &

# ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
# ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --setbsz 512 /dev/sda6
# ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/