Re: [PATCH 1/6] memcg: fix unused variable warning

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Mon Dec 26 2011 - 01:27:15 EST


On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 05:00:14 +0200
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘memcg_check_events’:
> mm/memcontrol.c:784:22: warning: unused variable ‘do_numainfo’ [-Wunused-variable]
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hmm ? Doesn't this fix cause a new Warning ?

mm/memcontrol.c: In function ?memcg_check_events?:
mm/memcontrol.c:789: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code

Thanks,
-Kame
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index d643bd6..a5e92bd 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -781,14 +781,15 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
> /* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
> if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
> - bool do_softlimit, do_numainfo;
> + bool do_softlimit;
>
> - do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> - MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
> #if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
> + bool do_numainfo;
> do_numainfo = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO);
> #endif
> + do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> + MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
> preempt_enable();
>
> mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
> --
> 1.7.7.3
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/