Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Dec 13 2011 - 07:42:06 EST


On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:57 +0900, Daisuke Nishimura wrote:

> kernel/sched_fair.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

you blink you loose, that file doesn't exist anymore.


> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 5c9e679..df145a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -4922,10 +4922,10 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
> * to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the
> * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares.
> */
> - if (!on_rq)
> + if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
> set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
> - if (!on_rq)
> + if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> p->se.vruntime += cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
> }
> #endif

The much saner way of writing that is something like:

/*
* Comment explaining stuff..
*/
if (!on_rq && p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
on_rq = 1;

...


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/