Re: [PATCH v3] mm: simplify find_vma_prev

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Mon Dec 12 2011 - 10:32:30 EST


(12/12/11 4:27 AM), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:49:30 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:48:40 -0500
kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

From: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 297c5eee37 (mm: make the vma list be doubly linked) added
vm_prev member into vm_area_struct. Therefore we can simplify
find_vma_prev() by using it. Also, this change help to improve
page fault performance because it has strong locality of reference.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Hmm, your work remind me of a patch I tried in past.
Here is a refleshed one...how do you think ?

==
From c0261936fc01322d06425731d33f38b2021e8067 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:31:19 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] per thread vma cache.

This is a toy patch. How do you think ?

This is a patch for per-thread mmap_cache without heavy atomic ops.

I'm sure overhead of find_vma() is pretty small in usual application
and this will not show good improvement. But I think, if we need
to have cache of vma, it should be per thread rather than per mm.

Agreed. per-thread is better.


This patch adds thread->mmap_cache, a pointer for vm_area_struct
and update it appropriately. Because we have no refcnt on vm_area_struct,
thread->mmap_cache may be a stale pointer. This patch detects stale
pointer by checking

- thread->mmap_cache is one of SLABs in vm_area_cachep.
- thread->mmap_cache->vm_mm == mm.

vma->vm_mm will be cleared before kmem_cache_free() by this patch.

Do you mean the cache can make mishit with unrelated vma when freed vma was reused?
If so, it is most tricky part of this patch, I strongly hope you write
a comment more.

Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/