Re: [RFC 1/3] pinctrl: add a driver for NVIDIA Tegra

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hence, there's no point parsing it from device tree; we end up with exactly
> the same data in the driver, yet have spent a bunch of time parsing it out
> from device tree instead of just embedding it into the kernel binary.

For me there are two points:

- Avoiding clash with kernel maintainers who hate firmware-like tables and
  binary data filling up the kernel. Some certain other guy bearing my
  name comes to mind.

- Footprint: the majority of the stuff in your driver ends up in non-discardable
  memory, and will be kept around. Since we have this concept of a
  single zImage for a number of say ARMv7 systems, and since pin
  controllers can be pretty hard to load from modules, *all* of them
  may have to be compiled-in. If every driver for every board takes this
  approach I am afraid it will be end up with a measurable footprint.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/