Re: [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support

[Hans Rosenfeld]

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:31:09PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@xxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > The lazy allocation of the xstate area has been removed. The support for
> > extended states that cannot be saved/restored lazily, like AMD's LWP,
> > need this. Since optimized library functions using SSE etc. are widely
> > used today, most processes would have an xstate area anyway, making the
> > memory overhead negligible.
> 
> Do you have any data on that?  It sounds dubious for specialized
> workloads.

What kind of specialized workload do you mean?


Hans


-- 
%SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, The operating system has been overthrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/