Re: [PATCH] sctp: integer overflow in sctp_auth_create_key()

From: Vladislav Yasevich
Date: Mon Nov 28 2011 - 10:45:13 EST


On 11/22/2011 08:25 PM, Xi Wang wrote:
> The previous commit 30c2235c is incomplete and cannot prevent integer
> overflows. For example, when key_len is 0x80000000 (INT_MAX + 1), the
> left-hand side of the check, (INT_MAX - key_len), which is unsigned,
> becomes 0xffffffff (UINT_MAX) and bypasses the check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/sctp/auth.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/auth.c b/net/sctp/auth.c
> index 865e68f..989e0fd 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/auth.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/auth.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static struct sctp_auth_bytes *sctp_auth_create_key(__u32 key_len, gfp_t gfp)
> struct sctp_auth_bytes *key;
>
> /* Verify that we are not going to overflow INT_MAX */
> - if ((INT_MAX - key_len) < sizeof(struct sctp_auth_bytes))
> + if (key_len > INT_MAX - sizeof(struct sctp_auth_bytes))
> return NULL;
>
> /* Allocate the shared key */


Hmm. Yes, this is a more correct check.

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx>


However, I don't think this is a security issue. As I've written before, this function is
called from 2 places:

1) setsockopt() code path

2) sctp_auth_asoc_set_secret() code path

In case (1), sca_keylength is never going to exceed 65535 since it's
bounded by a u16 from the user api. As such, The integer promotion will
not impact anything and the malloc() will never overflow.

In case (2), sca_keylength is computed based on the key the user provided
(MAX_USHORT) and the combination of protocol negotiated data where that
combination has a max size of 3 * MAX_USHORT (see sctp_auth_make_key_vector()).
So, even this case, our maximum key length can be 4* MAX_USHORT which still
will always be below MAX_INT and will not overflow.

So, I don't think there is big security consideration here, just a bad
check that just happens to always work.

-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/