Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() toallow switching of idle routines

[Deepthi Dharwar]

Hi Ben,

Thanks a lot for the review.

On 11/28/2011 04:18 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> This patch provides cpu_idle_wait() routine for the powerpc
>> platform which is required by the cpuidle subsystem. This
>> routine is requied to change the idle handler on SMP systems.
>> The equivalent routine for x86 is in arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> but the powerpc implementation is different.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> No, that patch also adds this idle boot override thing (can you pick a
> shorter name for boot_option_idle_override btw ?) which seems unrelated
> and without any explanation as to what it's supposed to be about.


 Yes, we can pick a better and shorter name for this variable.
 This variable is used to determine if cpuidle framework
 needs to be enabled and pseries_driver to be loaded or not.
 We disable cpuidle framework only when powersave_off option is set or
 not enabled by the user.

> 
> Additionally, I'm a bit worried (but maybe we already discussed that a
> while back, I don't know) but cpu_idle_wait() has "wait" in the name,
> which makes me think it might need to actually -wait- for all cpus to
> have come out of the function.


cpu_idle_wait is used to ensure that all the CPUs discard old idle
handler and update to new one.  Required while changing idle
handler on SMP systems.

> Now your implementation doesn't provide that guarantee. It might be
> fine, I don't know, but if it is, you'd better document it well in the
> comments surrounding the code, because as it is, all you do is shoot an
> interrupt which will cause the target CPU to eventually come out of idle
> some time in the future.


I was hoping that sending an explicit reschedule to the cpus would
do the trick but sure we can add some documentation around the code.

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
>>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig                 |    4 ++++
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h |    2 ++
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h    |    1 +
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c           |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> index b177caa..87f8604 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> @@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ config ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64
>>  	bool
>>  	default y if 64BIT
>>  
>> +config ARCH_HAS_CPU_IDLE_WAIT
>> +	bool
>> +	default y
>> +
>>  config GENERIC_HWEIGHT
>>  	bool
>>  	default y
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> index eb11a44..811b7e7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ static inline unsigned long get_clean_sp(struct pt_regs *regs, int is_32)
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +enum idle_boot_override {IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0, IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF};
>> +
>>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>  #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PROCESSOR_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
>> index e30a13d..ff66680 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
>> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ extern unsigned long klimit;
>>  extern void *zalloc_maybe_bootmem(size_t size, gfp_t mask);
>>  
>>  extern int powersave_nap;	/* set if nap mode can be used in idle loop */
>> +void cpu_idle_wait(void);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Atomic exchange
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> index 39a2baa..b478c72 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> @@ -39,9 +39,13 @@
>>  #define cpu_should_die()	0
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
>> +
>>  static int __init powersave_off(char *arg)
>>  {
>>  	ppc_md.power_save = NULL;
>> +	boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off);
>> @@ -102,6 +106,28 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * cpu_idle_wait - Used to ensure that all the CPUs come out of the old
>> + * idle loop and start using the new idle loop.
>> + * Required while changing idle handler on SMP systems.
>> + * Caller must have changed idle handler to the new value before the call.
>> + */
>> +void cpu_idle_wait(void)
>> +{
>> +	int cpu;
>> +	smp_mb();
>> +
>> +	/* kick all the CPUs so that they exit out of old idle routine */
>> +	get_online_cpus();
>> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> +		if (cpu != smp_processor_id())
>> +			smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
>> +	}
>> +	put_online_cpus();
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
>> +
>>  int powersave_nap;
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> Linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 
> 


Regards,
Deepthi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/