Re: [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve

[Will Drewry]

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
>> > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility
>> > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER.
>> >
>> > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Seen these around for a while ... :-)
>>
>> I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the
>> actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc.
>
> Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER
> upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ?

Thanks for following up! At present, it stalled out, so I think it'd
make sense to just drop it.  I will repost the series soon-ish and see
if any progress can be made.  [I've explored a number of alternative
approaches and still think something along the seccomp_filter lines is
still rational.]

cheers!
will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/