Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Enable cpuidle and directlycall cpuidle_idle_call() for pSeries

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Sun Nov 27 2011 - 18:05:48 EST


On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> This patch enables cpuidle for pSeries and cpuidle_idle_call() is
> directly called from the idle loop. As a result pseries_idle cpuidle
> driver registered with cpuidle subsystem comes into action. This patch
> also removes the routines pseries_shared_idle_sleep and
> pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep as they are now implemented as part of
> pseries_idle cpuidle driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 6 ++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 86 +-------------------------------
> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 2 -
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
> index e458872..0d2a028 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
> @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ config PPC_PASEMI_CPUFREQ
>
> endmenu
>
> +menu "CPUIdle driver"
> +
> +source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
> +
> +endmenu
> +
> config PPC601_SYNC_FIX
> bool "Workarounds for PPC601 bugs"
> depends on 6xx && (PPC_PREP || PPC_PMAC)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> index 9c6716a..f624e74 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/root_dev.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
>
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -74,9 +75,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(CMO_PageSize);
>
> int fwnmi_active; /* TRUE if an FWNMI handler is present */
>
> -static void pseries_shared_idle_sleep(void);
> -static void pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep(void);
> -
> static struct device_node *pSeries_mpic_node;
>
> static void pSeries_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m)
> @@ -374,18 +372,9 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void)
>
> pSeries_nvram_init();
>
> - /* Choose an idle loop */
> if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
> vpa_init(boot_cpuid);
> - if (get_lppaca()->shared_proc) {
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using shared processor idle loop\n");
> - ppc_md.power_save = pseries_shared_idle_sleep;
> - } else {
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using dedicated idle loop\n");
> - ppc_md.power_save = pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep;
> - }
> - } else {
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle loop\n");
> + ppc_md.power_save = (void *)cpuidle_idle_call;
> }

I very very much dislike that cast. You should not have to cast a
function pointer ... EVER.

> if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
> @@ -586,77 +575,6 @@ static int __init pSeries_probe(void)
> return 1;
> }
>

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/