Re: [PATCH 21/62] net: remove the second argument ofk[un]map_atomic()

[Eric Dumazet]

Le dimanche 27 novembre 2011 Ã 13:27 +0800, Cong Wang a Ãcrit :
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index cf480b5..b194beb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -3878,11 +3878,9 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
>  				if (length <= copybreak &&
>  				    skb_tailroom(skb) >= length) {
>  					u8 *vaddr;
> -					vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page,
> -					                    KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> +					vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page);
>  					memcpy(skb_tail_pointer(skb), vaddr, length);
> -					kunmap_atomic(vaddr,
> -					              KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> +					kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
>  					/* re-use the page, so don't erase
>  					 * buffer_info->page */
>  					skb_put(skb, length);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index a855db1..8603c87 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -1272,9 +1272,9 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq_ps(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
>  			 */
>  			dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&pdev->dev, ps_page->dma,
>  						PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> -			vaddr = kmap_atomic(ps_page->page, KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> +			vaddr = kmap_atomic(ps_page->page);
>  			memcpy(skb_tail_pointer(skb), vaddr, l1);
> -			kunmap_atomic(vaddr, KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> +			kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
>  			dma_sync_single_for_device(&pdev->dev, ps_page->dma,
>  						   PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  
> @@ -1465,12 +1465,10 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
>  				if (length <= copybreak &&
>  				    skb_tailroom(skb) >= length) {
>  					u8 *vaddr;
> -					vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page,
> -					                   KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> +					vaddr = kmap_atomic(buffer_info->page);
>  					memcpy(skb_tail_pointer(skb), vaddr,
>  					       length);
> -					kunmap_atomic(vaddr,
> -					              KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> +					kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
>  					/* re-use the page, so don't erase
>  					 * buffer_info->page */
>  					skb_put(skb, length);

But why are these drivers using kmap_atomic() in first place, since
their fragments are allocated in regular zone (GFP_ATOMIC or
GFP_KERNEL) ?




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/