Re: [PATCH v7 3.2-rc2 5/30] uprobes: copy of the originalinstruction.

From: Srikar Dronamraju
Date: Thu Nov 24 2011 - 07:51:08 EST


On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:40:16 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:37 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > + /* TODO : Analysis and verification of instruction
> > */
>
> As in refuse to set a breakpoint on an instruction we can't deal with?
>
> Do we care? The worst case we'll crash the program, but if we're
> allowed setting uprobes we already have enough privileges to do that
> anyway, right?
>

I think we should and we do care.
That's already implemented in the subsequent patches too.
For example: we don't a trace breakpoint instruction.

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/