Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework

[Ohad Ben-Cohen]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Saravana Kannan
<skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> remoteproc would probably be the best fit since it's already used in the
> code and people are used to discussing about it.

Guys you realize that 'amp' isn't really being used in the code
itself; this discussion boils down to the text we have in the patches'
subject line and the top level Kconfig/folder entry :)

But, sure, I'll just drop those 'amp' text instances, and we'll have
'remoteproc' and 'rpmsg' as separate top-level frameworks again.

Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/