Re: [PATCCH percpu: add cpunum param in per_cpu_ptr_to_phys

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Nov 15 2011 - 20:25:53 EST


Hello,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Does this matter?  If it's not a performance critical path, I'd rather
>> keep the generic funtionality.
>
> Hi, why not? the code is redundant, it's an improvement of the code, isn't it?
> Also, kernel code size will be smaller.

(scratching head...) Ummm... I'm not sure whether it's an improvement
or not. The contest is between loss of currently unused functionality
and meaningless optimization. I vote for status quo.

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/