Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not stall in synchronous compaction for THPallocations

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 03:00:09AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I didn't fill that gap but I was reading the code again and I don't
> see why we keep retrying for -EAGAIN in the !sync case. Maybe the
> below is good (untested). I doubt it's good to spend cpu to retry the
> trylock or to retry the migrate on a pinned page by O_DIRECT. In fact
> as far as THP success rate is concerned maybe we should "goto out"
> instead of "goto fail" but I didn't change to that as compaction even
> if it fails a subpage may still be successful at creating order
> 1/2/3/4...8 pages. I only avoid 9 loops to retry a trylock or a page
> under O_DIRECT. Maybe that will save a bit of CPU, I doubt it can
> decrease the success rate in any significant way. I'll test it at the
> next build...

At the same time also noticed another minor cleanup (also untested,
will text at next build together with some other stuff).

===
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] compaction: move ISOLATE_CLEAN setting out of
 compaction_migratepages loop

cc->sync and mode cannot change within the loop so move it out.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/compaction.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 899d956..be0be1d 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct zone *zone,
 			return ISOLATE_ABORT;
 	}
 
+	if (!cc->sync)
+		mode |= ISOLATE_CLEAN;
+
 	/* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
 	cond_resched();
 	spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
@@ -349,9 +352,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct zone *zone,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (!cc->sync)
-			mode |= ISOLATE_CLEAN;
-
 		/* Try isolate the page */
 		if (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode, 0) != 0)
 			continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/