Re: 3.2-rc1: INFO: possible recursive locking detected

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:43:13AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:05:57PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just get below waring when doing:
> > > for i in `seq 1 10`; do ./perf bench -f simple sched messaging -g 40; done
> > >
> > > And kernel config is attached.
> >
> > This appears to me to be the same false positive from the slab allocator
> > that has been seen before.  Christoph, any progress on this?
> 
> No this is another issue because it is not SLAB but SLUB. Must be a bug
> introduced by the recent merges of the per cpu partial list support.

Ah, OK.  Thank you for looking this over and for the suggested solutions!

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/