[PATCH] bridge: Fix potential deadlock on br->multicast_lock

From: Andrew Vagin
Date: Thu Nov 10 2011 - 10:47:55 EST


multicast_lock is taken in softirq context, so we should use
spin_lock_bh() in userspace.

call-chain in softirq context:
run_timer_softirq()
br_multicast_query_expired()

call-chain in userspace:
sysfs_write_file()
store_multicast_snooping()
br_multicast_toggle()

Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
index 995cbe0..2eefe27 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
@@ -1770,7 +1770,7 @@ int br_multicast_toggle(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
int err = 0;
struct net_bridge_mdb_htable *mdb;

- spin_lock(&br->multicast_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->multicast_lock);
if (br->multicast_disabled == !val)
goto unlock;

@@ -1806,7 +1806,7 @@ rollback:
}

unlock:
- spin_unlock(&br->multicast_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->multicast_lock);

return err;
}
--
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/