Re: [PATCH] Make dmi_name_in_vendors more focused

From: Jean Delvare
Date: Thu Nov 10 2011 - 03:07:23 EST


On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:35:20 +0100, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:25:57 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:26:47 +0100
> > Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This patch was already sent on 2011-05-15. I thought Andrew had
> > > picked it up but apparently not, otherwise it should already be
> > > upstream by now.
> >
> > I did merge it in May and have carried it in -mm (and hence in
> > linux-next) since then. I have sent it to Jesse at least twice, with
> > no effect.
>
> I don't generally look after DMI stuff...

Indeed I'm not sure why Jesse would take this, it's not PCI-related in
any way.

> I can queue it though if you
> want. My only worry is potential breakage for existing DMI matches,
> but it looks like Jean already did the audit for that.

Yes I did, both at the time of the original submission and again when
resending.

--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/