Re: [PATCH v3] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd addressis invalid

[Matthew Garrett]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 12:45:31PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 12:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 12:36:13PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > 
> >> Yes, I think it makes a lot of sense.  If we need to introduce new
> >> meta-types to deal with the fact that there are EFI types that don't map
> >> to E820, then so be it... and this is *exactly* why we want the EFI
> >> setup stub to be part of the kernel image and not off in a separate
> >> bootloader, requiring a stable interface...
> > 
> > I don't disagree, it's just going to be an absolute pain to manage that 
> > in a secure boot world.
> 
> Could you clarify, please?

If the kernel is able to call boot services then the kernel needs to be 
signed. If it's all handled by the bootloader then the bootloader can be 
signed and the kernel doesn't have to be. Depends which one people 
update more, I guess.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/