Re: [PATCH -v2] acpi: Fix possible recursive locking in hwregs.c

[Rakib Mullick]

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/06/2011 08:48 PM, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>
> It would be a good idea to also give the lockdep warning in the changelog
> (though you triggered it in a modified kernel), since that would make
> it very clear as to what problem your patch is trying to solve.

At the time of this reply, it's been taken. So, I'll keep it on mind
for next time.

> [And please line-wrap your changelog to 80 characters at most, per line].
>
Gmail's email editor automatically puts break on a line, that's why I
didn't put any line break on changelog. While I was reading my patch
on lkml.org, I've noticed that it creates a big one line changelog,
which is a bit weird. So, will keep it under 80 line from next time.

> Code-wise, the patch looks good to me. So,
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Thanks,
Rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/