Re: [PATCH 12/49] MIPS: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED

[Yong Zhang]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:49:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yong,
> 
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:10:48 +0800 Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:21:06PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > > Thanks, queued for 3.3.  I resolved a conflict in dbdma.c and remove
> > > one IRQF_DISABLED which had been missed in arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c.
> > 
> > And FYI, my patch is based on next-20111014 when I made it.
> 
> You should never base anything on top of a linux-next tree.  You should
> use the tree you are fixing (Linus' or the Mips tree or ...) as the base.

Thanks for your reminding Stephen :)

So I guess 'basing on linux-next' also brings some trouble to tglx,
which is hard for him to pick them up.

I think I should base my patch on -tip for the leftovers, tglx?
Or let me know your opinion if you have different idea.

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/