Re: [PATCH] pm: remove useless array definition in cpuidle_structure

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Len, Arjan,

On Friday, November 04, 2011, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> On Friday 04 November 2011 03:14 AM, Robert Lee wrote:
> > From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > All the modules name are ro-data, it is never copied to the array.
> > 
> > eg.
> > 
> > static struct cpuidle_driver intel_idle_driver = {
> >         .name = "intel_idle",
> >         .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> > 
> > It safe to assign the pointer of this ro-data to a const char *.
> > By this way we save 12 bytes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Lee <rob.lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/cpuidle.h |    4 ++--
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> > index b51629e..16f9dce 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> > @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ static inline int cpuidle_get_last_residency(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> >   ****************************/
> > 
> >  struct cpuidle_driver {
> > -	char			name[CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN];
> > -	struct module 		*owner;
> > +	const char    *name;
> > +	struct module *owner;
> >  };
> > 
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> 
> This looks good, and makes it fool-proof by  not allowing one to tamper the name of the driver.
> Tested OK on x86 (both Intel idle and ACPI)
> 
> Tested-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This is simple enough for me to push it for 3.2, but I woulnd't like to
step on anyone's toes.  Please let me know what you think.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/