Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] security: Yama LSM

[James Morris]

On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Kees Cook wrote:

> > We probably need to flesh out criteria for inclusion in Yama and document
> > it.
> 
> What's the best way for me to help with that documentation?

Perhaps post a basic document for review.  It doesn't have to be a novel.

One thing I'd like to see is making it clear that if a feature is nacked 
by a core maintainer, Yama is not a means to bypass that nack.  That 
maintainer will need to ack it as part of Yama, too.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/